The History of the Term "Artificial Intelligence": Why the Term "AI" Is an Antithesis
Valery M. Anikin
Abstract
Using philosophical, semantic, and cognitive analysis, this article examines the origins of the term "artificial intelligence (AI)" (Dartmouth, 1956), demonstrating its connotative structure and a linguistic error in its translation into Russian. The correct definition of AI systems as imitators of human cognitive functions is substantiated. The negative consequences of the connotative term "artificial intelligence" are noted, leading to a misunderstanding of the capabilities of AI systems—attributing them to mental properties and a fear of "thinking machines." A number of antitheses are proposed to figuratively characterize the connotative nature of the term "AI." One of them is biblical: "Quae sunt Caesaris Caesari, et quae sunt Dei Deo" ("Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's"). The need for legislative restrictions on the mindless, ubiquitous use of AI technology in areas where human intelligence is intended is supported. It is man, and not the technologies he has created, who is ultimately responsible for the negative results of their application in various spheres of life.
Speaker
Valery M. Anikin
Saratov State University
Russia
Discussion
Ask question
